The Impact of Software Quality on Maintenance, Time to Market, and Total Cost of Ownership
Software quality is a critical factor in the development and deployment of successful applications. It directly impacts a range of business outcomes, including maintenance, time to market, and total cost of ownership.
As a management consultant with a PhD in software engineering, I have seen the impact of software quality firsthand and would like to share my insights on the topic.
Maintenance
Software quality affects maintenance in several ways. Poorly designed and coded applications are often difficult to understand, making it challenging for developers to fix bugs and add new features. This can result in a high cost of maintenance, as well as longer lead times for bug fixes and feature deployments.
On the other hand, high-quality software that follows best practices for design and coding is much easier to maintain. This leads to a lower cost of maintenance and faster lead times for bug fixes and feature deployments.
According to a study by the Standish Group, projects with higher levels of software quality are less likely to experience delays, cost overruns, and are more likely to be delivered on time and within budget.
The study found that well-designed and well-written code leads to a reduction in the number of bugs, which in turn reduces the time and effort required for maintenance.
An open-source toolchain like Bit can help you improve software quality and maintainability, by providing a platform for managing and sharing reusable components — whether you’re on microservices, micro-frontends, or simply looking to break up a monolith.
By isolating reusable code and independently publishing, testing, documenting, and versioning them as individual building blocks with Bit, you can maximize scalability and maintainability of your codebase, while minimizing delays, and projects that run over budget. Learn more here.
Time to Market
Time to market is an important factor for many organizations. Poor software quality can significantly slow down the development process and delay the launch of new products and services.
On the other hand, high-quality software allows organizations to develop and launch new products and services quickly, which can give them a competitive advantage.
According to a study by the Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute, software quality has a direct impact on time to market. The study found that organizations with high-quality software are able to get products and services to market faster, which can give them a competitive advantage.
Additionally, the study found that organizations with high-quality software are able to make changes to their products and services quickly and with less effort, which can also give them a competitive advantage.
Total Cost of Ownership
Finally, the total cost of ownership of an application is impacted by software quality. Poor quality software leads to higher costs due to the need for frequent maintenance and bug fixes. This can also result in longer development cycles, which can impact the organization’s bottom line.
On the other hand, high-quality software reduces the total cost of ownership, as it requires fewer bug fixes and maintenance, and can be developed and deployed more quickly.
According to a study by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the total cost of ownership of an application is directly impacted by software quality.
The study found that organizations with high-quality software enjoy lower costs due to the reduced need for maintenance and bug fixes.
Additionally, the study found that high-quality software can be developed and deployed more quickly, which can reduce the total cost of ownership.
Correlation between Software Quality Ratings and Cost for Maintenance
Software quality ratings, such as the Software Improvement Groups (SIG) star rating system, Tiobe TICS, provide a measure of the quality of software, which can be used to evaluate the cost of maintaining software.
Generally, software quality ratings use a 1-to-5 star or A-to-F scale, with a higher score indicating a higher level of quality. The higher the software quality rating, the lower the cost of maintaining the software.
Studies have shown a strong correlation between software quality ratings and the cost of maintaining software.
For example, a study by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) found that the cost of maintaining software with a high quality rating was significantly lower than the cost of maintaining software with a lower quality rating.
The study found that organizations with high-quality software enjoy lower costs due to the reduced need for maintenance and bug fixes, as well as a faster time to market.
Software quality ratings provide a useful measure of the quality of software, which can be used to evaluate the cost of maintaining software. Organizations that prioritize software quality and strive to achieve a high rating can enjoy lower costs, faster lead times, and a competitive advantage.
By investing in high-quality software development practices and ensuring that their development teams have the necessary skills and tools, organizations can ensure the success of their applications and meet the needs of their customers and stakeholders.
In conclusion, software quality has a significant impact on maintenance, time to market, and total cost of ownership. Organizations that prioritize software quality can enjoy lower costs, faster lead times, and a competitive advantage.
It is essential for organizations to invest in high-quality software development practices and to ensure that their development teams have the necessary skills and tools to deliver high-quality software. By doing so, organizations can ensure the success of their applications and meet the needs of their customers and stakeholders.
From monolithic to composable software with Bit
Bit’s open-source tool help 250,000+ devs to build apps with components.
Turn any UI, feature, or page into a reusable component — and share it across your applications. It’s easier to collaborate and build faster.
Split apps into components to make app development easier, and enjoy the best experience for the workflows you want:
→ Micro-Frontends
→ Design System
→ Code-Sharing and reuse
→ Monorepo
Learn more
References:
- Standish Group. (1995). Chaos report.
- Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute. (n.d.). The impact of software quality on time-to-market.
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2002). Total cost of ownership of software
